Could it really be that simple?

I am thinking about a circle, how there is no starting point. A circle gets fully drawn only after the pencil returns to the point where it started. Until the loop has been completed, it does not appear to be complete. The moment you go over the same point again, it traces darker, and you need to complete the circle again to balance it. In this way I also view life as a circle.

Imagine questions and answers as analogous to tying up buttons on a shirt, when no button is tied, one needs to identify the starting point and fit in the first button right, then go sequentially down or up and do up all the remaining buttons relative to one another until you are either out of buttons or holes.

What if you miss judged the first button and paired up all the other buttons relative to it? You'd end up with unpaired buttons in equal amounts to the holes on either sides.

Today we still find the holes and buttons left unpaired. Questions unanswered and answers unexplained. Why do we reach both ends with the same question, the macroscopic question and the microscopic question? How are these two different? What if they are a part of the same loop, and there are always more holes than buttons?

There are questions, there are answers, there is truth, there is justification. At the unification of everything, all of this, there is a question mark..... Choice. 

This is a blog where I play with these thoughts. I lay out the questions and approach to understand them.

All about exploring and understanding patterns around us. Its the art in science and the science in art.

It all starts making sense.